Skip to content
Technology

Anthropic Bars Claude Code From Cloning Existing Games

Anthropic quietly blocked Claude Code from recreating specific video games, and developers noticed fast.

Edited by Ryan Elliott Dennis5 min read · 1,046 words · 6 sources
Skyline Tower in Bellevue, Washington, headquarters of Valve, which runs the Steam store
Skyline Tower in Bellevue, Washington, headquarters of Valve, which runs the Steam store. Photo: SounderBruce from Seattle, United States / Wikimedia Commons, CC BY-SA 2.0
“Anthropic's fix took two sentences, and the company stayed quiet about it for 3 days. Does a 3-day silence undercut a fix that short?”

Anthropic confirmed on Oct. 30 that it told Claude Code to stop rebuilding specific video games1. The rule had already been running for three days before anyone outside the company said a word about it2.

Addy Osmani, a member of Anthropic's technical staff, explained the change on X. "We added two sentences to Claude Code's prompt on Opus 5.5 to steer it away from recreating someone else's specific game because using Claude to infringe IP is against our usage policy," he said1. His post answered a discovery that had already spread across the gaming side of X.

Anthropic Took 3 Days to Confirm Claude Code's New Rule

Dated steps from the rule's first appearance in Claude Code to Anthropic's public confirmation, October 2026

The first pin is the day chasm reported the rule already running inside Claude Code; the second pin is the day Addy Osmani confirmed it on X.

Data through Oct. 31, 2026.

Sources: Addy Osmani (@addyosmani) on X [1]; chasm (@chasmmmmmmmmmmm) on X [2]. Chart by Kelly Dennis.

The numbers behind this chart
DateEvent
Oct. 27, 2026Rule appears. Server-delivered, missing from the changelog
Oct. 30, 2026Anthropic confirms. Osmani replies to chasm's post

Two Sentences, Sent Quietly

A user posting as chasm found the rule first2. It arrived under a flag named tengu_heron_brook, sent straight from Anthropic's own servers. That is how a company often pushes a quiet update to a live product, between one release and the next.

Claude Code's changelog skipped the change entirely. The rule stayed fixed in place, permanent across every settings menu Claude Code offers2.

Anthropic wrote the rule itself. Chasm's post captured its exact words: "Do build original games, games in a genre, and games from the user's own designs and assets. Don't build a recreation of a specific existing game, even if it is renamed or called original"2.

A usage policy is the set of rules a company writes to limit what someone can do with its product. Anthropic bars Claude from helping anyone break copyright or other intellectual property law. This rule enforces that line inside one specific tool. That line already existed in writing, long before chasm found this new sentence inside it.

chasm@chasmmmmmmmmmmm

ANTHROPIC IS CRACKING DOWN ON VIDEO GAME REWRITES 🚨

Claude Code picked up a new rule around Oct 27, sent from Anthropic’s servers under a flag called "tengu_heron_brook". There’s no setting to turn it off.

The full rule: “Do build original games, games in a genre, and games… pic.twitter.com/0Zc5mQWHJt

A screenshot of Claude Code's new server-delivered rule against recreating existing video games
Open on X (opens a new tab)

chasm's Oct. 30 post first showed the rule's exact wording, three days after it began running inside Claude Code.Post by chasm (@chasmmmmmmmmmmm) on X, Oct. 30, 2026

Weeks of Clones Pushed It

The rule followed weeks of complaints from game developers3. Alliance Arts canceled the public demo for its coming Steam game, Drunken Goddess Reflux. The studio worried its content "could be used to quickly imitate or replicate the game's presentation and gameplay with AI".

Other developers had pressed Valve, which runs the Steam store, about the same flood of copies3. Steam's most recent Next Fest doubled its showcased demos over the one before it, and AI-assisted games drove most of that growth4.

A single studio's canceled demo turns into a pattern fast once a storefront doubles in size over one season. Each new entrant weighs the same choice Alliance Arts made. Show the work and risk a copy, or hold it back and lose the audience a demo earns.

Valve's Steam Deck handheld, which runs games bought through the Steam store
Valve's Steam Deck runs games bought through Valve's own store. Developers had been pressing Valve for weeks about AI-made clones flooding that same store.Liam Dawe/GamingOnLinux / Wikimedia Commons, CC BY-SA 4.0

Two Answers to One Problem

Osmani said the rule leaves most games untouched. "Original games, genre games, and games built from your own designs and assets are meant to keep working," he said1. He also left an opening for mistakes: "We'll continue to iterate to ensure we're striking the right balance. In the meantime, if Claude turns down something that's yours, send it my way".

Valve answers the same complaint on different ground. Tom Giardino, speaking for Valve at Steam's Indie Connect event, framed Valve's stance plainly: the company stays clear of acting "to be gatekeepers telling developers which tools they should or shouldn't use"4.

Giardino pointed developers toward their own work instead. A game stays ahead of its copies, he said, only when its maker keeps "growing your game by adding features, personality and creativity that stem from your own perspective"4.

One company changed its own product. The other told developers to out-build the problem themselves. Both leave an already-shipped clone standing exactly in place.

The split matters past this one rule. A developer chasing a fix from Anthropic waits on a prompt change reaching every model Claude Code runs. One chasing a fix from Valve instead waits on their own studio alone, for better and for worse.

What the Rule Misses

Claude Code still relies on the user's own claim about who owns the game they're building3. Models that run on a person's own computer answer to a rule book someone other than Anthropic wrote.

Game Developer's own reporting noted that clever prompts have bypassed safety limits on AI tools before. A cloner determined enough could switch to a model built under an entirely different rule book6.

One paid side effect surfaced fast. A developer builds digital wargame modules for clients who already own the physical games. That developer filed a complaint on Anthropic's own code repository on Oct. 30. Sessions that had done this work for months began refusing it, once the new rule arrived5.

The complaint asked Anthropic for three fixes5. A narrower rule topped the list, aimed only at real infringement.

Next came a verification path, a way for a paying professional to prove ownership. Documentation came last: a changelog entry for a change this size. Each of the three sat unanswered by Oct. 31.

All 3 of the GitHub Complaint's Requests Sit Unanswered

Requests in the Oct. 30 complaint against Claude Code's new rule, by whether Anthropic had answered each one as of Oct. 31, 2026

Each cube is one request the complaint made to Anthropic; every cube stays magenta because all three sat unanswered as of Oct. 31.

Data through Oct. 31, 2026.

Source: GitHub (anthropics/claude-code, issue #106167) [5]. Chart by Kelly Dennis.

The numbers behind this chart
ItemValue
Unanswered requests3
Whole3
A boxed Subor Liko KL-235, a hardware clone of Nintendo's Famicom sold in Russia
A Subor Liko KL-235, a hardware clone of Nintendo's Famicom once sold in Russia. Game cloning predates AI by decades; AI tools just make a copy faster to build.https://www.flickr.com/photos/40122397@N00/10449588165/ / Wikimedia Commons, CC BY 2.0

What to Do

Does your team use Claude Code anywhere near a game, a mod, or licensed creative assets? Test a real project against the new rule before a client deadline does it for you. Report a refusal on legitimate work to Osmani directly, the way he asked. Switching tools on the spot skips a fix that might already be underway.

Keep a record of what your vendor's AI tool blocks and why. A rule this narrow can still catch work meant to stay untouched, and a saved example speeds up any appeal.

By the Numbers

  • 2 sentences: what Osmani said joined Claude Code's prompt on Opus 5.51.
  • 3 days: how long the rule ran before anyone outside Anthropic said a word, Oct. 27 to Oct. 3012.
  • 1 flag: tengu_heron_brook, the name attached to the server-delivered change2.
  • 0 of 3: the GitHub complaint's requests answered by Oct. 315.
  • Roughly 2 times: how much Steam's most recent Next Fest grew its showcased demos over the one before it4.

What to Watch

Watch whether Anthropic builds the verification path the GitHub complaint asked for5. That would be a way for a paying professional to prove they own the game they're building. A rival coding tool adopting a matching rule, or leaving the door open on purpose, deserves the same attention. Valve's next move matters just as much: a storefront that currently declines to screen tools may yet turn to screening games instead.

Sources

  1. Addy Osmani (@addyosmani), post on X, Oct. 30, 2026, https://x.com/addyosmani/status/2116213240363729013
  2. chasm (@chasmmmmmmmmmmm), post on X, Oct. 30, 2026, https://x.com/chasmmmmmmmmmmm/status/2116062991686721968
  3. Callum Doyle, "Anthropic adds new Claude rule banning recreations of existing games," Dexerto, Oct. 31, 2026, https://www.dexerto.com/gaming/anthropic-adds-new-claude-rule-banning-recreations-of-existing-games-3423516/
  4. Rick Lane, "Anthropic updates Claude to 'steer it away' from letting users clone games following weeks of Steam being inundated with AI slop," PC Gamer, Oct. 31, 2026, https://www.pcgamer.com/gaming-industry/anthropic-updates-claude-to-steer-it-away-from-letting-users-clone-games-following-weeks-of-steam-being-inundated-with-ai-slop/
  5. lerugray, "[URGENT] Server-delivered "games" instruction blocks professional development work," GitHub issue #106167, anthropics/claude-code, Oct. 30, 2026, https://github.com/anthropics/claude-code/issues/106167
  6. Bryant Francis, "Anthropic appears to have ordered AI tool Claude to stop remaking video games," Game Developer, Oct. 30, 2026, https://www.gamedeveloper.com/programming/anthropic-appears-to-have-ordered-ai-tool-claude-to-stop-remaking-video-games

Cite this piece

Kelly Dennis, "Anthropic Bars Claude Code From Cloning Existing Games," AI Lately, Oct 31, 2026, https://ailately.com/articles/anthropic-bars-claude-code-cloning-games

Tags: Claude Code · Anthropic · Steam · AI game clones · usage policy

Related, lately

More

Keyboard

j k
Move through a list
Enter
Open the selected piece
/
Search, and browse the columns
g then r
Right Now
g then a
Articles
g then s
The Signal
g then o
Opinion
g then b
Analysis
g then p
People
?
This sheet
Esc
Close

AI Lately Pro

Be the one who already knew.

With Pro
You already know what ships next week and who just moved, with the source.
Without it
You hear about it days later, from a screenshot in someone's Slack.

$19 a month. Cancel any time.

See everything Pro opensAsk the editor

Secure checkout through Stripe. Member? Sign in.