How much proof is behind the claim?
An AI startup says its product works. This tool shows what a reader can find to back that up, and what is still unproven.
- Type the company, and the claim if you have one.
- Open the company's pages. Tick each kind of evidence you find.
- Read what is still unproven, then copy the link or the report.
Nothing is ticked yet. Open the company's pages and tick what you find.
This company shows 0% of the evidence across 5 parts
How much of each part is ticked.
Each spoke is one question. The farther the dot sits from the middle, the more evidence you found for it.
The numbers behind this chart
| Item | Value | Note |
|---|---|---|
| Built | 0% | 0 of 6 found |
| Users | 0% | 0 of 6 found |
| Measured | 0% | 0 of 6 found |
| Checked | 0% | 0 of 6 found |
| Behind it | 0% | 0 of 4 found |
01
Can you see it work?
First, see what was built. Tick each one you found.
0/6
02
Who uses it?
Real use is the best sign a product works. Tick each one you found.
0/6
03
Is the result measured?
A claim such as "60 percent faster" needs a test behind it. Tick each one you found.
0/6
04
Did someone else check it?
Proof counts most when the company does not control it. Tick each one you found.
0/6
05
Who is behind it, and who pays?
People and money are checkable facts too. Tick each one you found.
0/4
Result
What is still unproven about this company
Every check left open is a question to ask the company, or a page to look for.
28/28
- Anyone can try the product today
- A recorded demo shows the product doing the whole job
- The price is on the company's site
- Public instructions explain how it works
- A dated list of changes shows it keeps getting updates
- The code is public, or a developer can call it and see results
- Customers are named on the company's site
- A named customer says in their own words what changed
- A customer confirms the use on their own site or in their own post
- Usage numbers say what was counted and the date
- A case study gives the starting point, the result and the time it took
- Reviews from real users appear on a site the company does not run
- The claim names the test it was measured on
- The scores are published, so anyone can read them
- The method is shared, so another team can run the test again
- The result sits next to a rival or a plain starting point
- The product version and the test date are named
- The size of the test is stated
- A group the company does not pay ran its own test
- A public leaderboard run by someone else lists the result
- Another team repeated the result and got about the same number
- Experts who do not work for the company reviewed a paper about it
- A reporter or researcher used it and wrote down what happened
- An outside audit covers security or safety
- The founders are named, and their past jobs show up on pages the company does not run
- The funding round appears in a government filing or on the investor's own page
- A revenue claim comes from a filing, an audit or a named financial source
- Public terms say who owns the data you put in